相關文章                          GMO面面觀網站

                                                                                                               

 
  • 陳烈夫等:基因轉殖作物共存模式與隔離距離科學農業,56:35-47。FILE (2008/01)

  • 柯一嘉 基因轉殖植物之危害、評估與責任。農業世界,(285):77-81。 FILE  (2007/05) 

  • 李森堙基改種子與專利品銷售後使用限制之爭議科技法律透析,19(04)  (2007/04) 

  • 王明來 美國基因改造稻米污染事件發生與處理經過之啟示農政與農情 (176): 90-97。  FILE   (2007/02) 

  • 蔣慕琰 袁秋英基因轉殖植物雜草風險研究與評估。林俊義、石信德、張有明、王強生(主編)基因轉殖植物之生物安全與檢測專刊。行政院農業委員會農業試驗所,頁65-85。(2005/12)  FILE 

  • 林順福:中草藥基原之DNA 鑑定 (2006/10)  FILE 

  • 郭華仁基改作物的生產及其共存問題(2006/11)  FILE

  • 郭華仁基改作物與有機農業可以共存嗎?(2006/11)  FILE

  • 郭華仁:基改作物與有機農業共存的考慮要旨(2006/09/01)  FILE

  • 羅致逑基改植物之環境安全風險評估。科技發展政策報導。(2006/05)  FILE

  • 林靜宜&詹富智無篩選標示基因(marker-free)轉基因植物之構築及其最新發展。植物病理學會刊14卷3期:159-176    (2005/09)

  • 陳文珊基因轉殖作物之商業倫理初探-以孟山都vs.許麥茲案為例。道雜誌18期:70-83  (2004/02)

  • 林順福:高科技、高資金、高利潤、高風險下的農業生技產業 --- 台灣要走出自己的方向。2006-03 FILE

  • 郭華仁:基因改造產品的現況與問題。2006-02 FILE

  • 高文彥:基改法規我國宜有因應之道。 2005-11-28   FILE  

  • 羅致逑:基改植物安全評估 (一)抗藥性基因。2005-10  FILE

  • 高文彥:基因改造食品國際規範-食品法典委員會未來四年的新任務與挑戰。基因改造產品風險管理國際研討會,2005-09-21   FILE

  • 郭華仁:基改作物的全球現況與紛爭。「認識基因改造產品培訓班」研習手冊,頁22-432005-08-30 FILE

  • 林順福作物品種之DNA 鑑定技術。2005-06-25  FILE

  • 郭華仁:基改作物的全球現況與我國農作物生物科技政策。 2005-04  FILE

  • 林順福生物技術在水稻育種上之應用。『東部稻米產銷研討會專刊』第33-46 2005-04-01  FILE

  • 周桂田基因改造螢光魚的風險評估與科技政策  2005-03  FILE

  • 王美花:開放植物專利 之利弊分析。農委會農糧署主辦「研商是否開放植物專利座談會」專題演講  2005-03-14   FILE

  • 郭華仁是否給於植物專利保護的考慮要旨。農委會農糧署主辦「研商是否開放植物專利座談會」專題演講 2005-03-14  FILE

  • 衛生署  2003年基因改造食品市場監測調查報告   Source   File

  • 基因改造議題講座:從紛爭到展望    2004-08-06    

  • 潘子明2003年全球基因改造作物之發展。生物產業 15: 37-50.   2004-03  File

  • 李素華避免基因改造作物污染及消費者選擇權 ∼德國研擬基因改造管理相關規範   2004-03-29   File

  •  潘子明基因改造食品之最新發展與檢驗2004-03-03

  • 吳宗熹(譯)  全球商業化轉基因作物狀況:2003     2004/02        

  • 李素華避免基因改造作物污染及消費者選擇權 ∼德國將採行GMO新規範   2004-1-27   File

  • 陳烈夫 呂秀英 呂椿堂 魏夢麗:轉基因作物安全性風險評估的程序與方法 2004   File   

  • 我國與歐美有機農產品驗證制度之比較      2003/12/3  source

  • 林順福:生物技術在水稻育種上之應用2003/10/30   File

  • 歐盟  開放基改食物販售但要標示 2003/09/ source

  • 徐慈鴻 李貽華  李國欽基轉植物之生物安全性評估及管理2003   File

  • 澳洲 最新GMO民調 。2003/08/18 (Source)

  • 海市第二中級法院受理中國第一起轉基因食品標識官司   2003/08/06 (Source

  • 梵諦岡聲明支持基因改造食品 :梵諦岡官員聲明支持基因改造食品,表示有助於解決世界饑荒及營養缺乏問題。梵諦岡擬於九月發布正式官方研究報告,表達對生物科技的看法。 2003/07~08    Source  Source

  • FAO: ANIMAL BIOTECHNOLOGIES : STATE OF THE ART, RISKS AND PERSPECTIVES    2003/06     Source

  •   鄭呈皇如何辨識基因改造食物?2003/05/26  source 

  • 牛惠之生物科技之風險議題之省思與管理     2003-03-10 File

  • 郭華仁基因改造作物與農業政策  2002/12/28   

  • 牛惠之: 由番茄一號談基因改造產品之風險與迷思     2002/11/04  Source 

  • 何建志 基因資訊與保險:社會政策與法理分析   2002/06/27     Source

  • 黃三光、曾經洲:基因改造作物的優點與潛藏危機      2002/01/25 Source

  • 環境保護分子生物科技策略論壇(V)會議資料集   2002/01/25  source

  • 周桂田:正視基因玉米事件 我們不想當「白老鼠」   2000/12/17 Source

  • 牛惠之、張孫福:論基因改良食品之風險與社會議題-一點法律人之觀察與省思    2001/11/16    Source

  • 李素華由聯合國及歐盟基因改造食品管理標示規範趨勢研析我國基因改造食品相關法制    2001-09; -10  File

  • 牛惠之:論開放生物科技運用所潛藏之社會衝擊與法律省思-
    以法律對於GMOs之保障與規範趨勢為例   2001/06/10      Source

  • 林怡杏基因改造食品之檢測    2001/04/01    Source

  • 周桂田基因食品標示侵犯消費者權益   2001/03/28    Source

  • 美國Organic Farming Research Foundation對於 GMO的反對立場:GMO POLICY STATEMENT          2001/03/ 23    

  • 陳烈夫 呂秀英 呂椿堂 魏夢麗: 轉基因作物的安全性分析  2001   File

  • 牛惠之:論開放生物科技運用所潛藏之社會衝擊與法律省思- 以法律對於GMOs之保障與規範趨勢為例(簡版Source

  • 周桂田:基因改造食品的衝擊風險與資訊民主   2000/12/19 Source

  • 周桂田:面對基因食品風險 消費者有知和行動的權利   2000/08   Source

  • 何建志GMOs的法律問題與管制模式分析   2000/04    Source

  • 蔡宗珍基因科技法之規範架構初論  2000/03/12 

  • 生物安全議定書:發展中國家將是真正的輸家!!      2000/03  Source

  • Monsanto:諾貝爾和平獎獲得者說:"抵制GMO的輿論很快會消失"   2000/  Source 

  • 周桂田: 基因改造產品應強制標示     1999/11    Source

  • 國貿局:當前生物科技於食品工業之應用-基因轉殖作物問題之探討    1999/   Source

  • 蔡慶修:生物技術對人類的衝擊-GMO食品的省思  Source 

  • 陳啟祥基因改造生物的風險評估與風險管理  Source

  • 2008-01 Market report: Rice industry in crisis. Greenpeace (2007-01) PDF

  • 2007-06  A typology of the effects of (trans)gene flow on the conservation and sustainable use of genetic resources. (Jack A. Heinemann; Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture, FAO, 2007-06.  PDF or ftp://ftp.fao.org/ag/cgrfa/bsp/bsp35e.pdf )

  • 2007-06  Agricultural biotechnology: yield, competitiveness, jobs and environmental impact. Input to Resolution 2006/2059(INI) November 2006 (mutatoes.org: HTM)

  • 2007-03  GM Food Nightmare Unfolding in the Regulatory Sham. (Mae-Wan Ho et al., 2007  Report)

  • 2006-11  WHO BENEFITS FROM GM CROPS? - MONSANTO AND THE CORPORATE-DRIVEN GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROP REVOLUTION. (Friends of the Earth, 2006.) PDF

  • 2006-08  Pharma crops State of field trials worldwide (Andreas Bauer: HTM)

  • 2006-07  Consultation on proposals for managing the coexistence of GM, conventional and organic crops (DEFRA, UK)   PDF

  • 2006-03  GM Contamination Report 2005: A review of cases of contamination, illegal planting and negative side effects of genetically modified organisms. (GeneWatch UK and Greenpeace International)  Source

  • 2005-09  Setting standards: Biotechnology in the Marketplace. (Proceedings from a Roundtable Discussion, December 15-16, 2004, The Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)  Source

  • 2005-05   Status of Research and Application of Crop Biotechnologies in Developing Countries: A preliminary Assessment. (FAO, Source)

  • 2004-12  Just Knowledge? Governing research on food and farming. (Food Ethics Council)  Source

  • 2003-09  Engineering nutrition: GM crops for global justice? (Food Ethics Council) Full report 

  • 2003-12-04  Report on coexistence between genetically modified crops and conventional and organic crops. (EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT)  Full report

  • 1999-10  Novel foods: beyond Nuffield. (Food Ethics Council)  Source

  • 2002-03-22  Public attitudes to GM. (Food Standards Agency, UK)    Source

  • 2004-12  Tending the fields: State & federal roles in the oversight of genetically modified crops. (Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology)  Source

  • 2004-09  Trade, Standards, and the Political Economy of Genetically Modified Food. (K. Anderson, R. Damania and L.A. Jackson, World Bank).  Source

  • 2004-06-07 Co-existence in North American agriculture: can GM crops be grown with conventional and organic crops? (G. Brookes & P. BarfootSource

  • 2004-05-17  European Communities – Measures Affecting the Approval and Marketing of Biotech Products (DS291, DS292, DS293) (EC)   File

  • 2004-05-14 Co-existence of GM and non GM arable crops: the non GM and organic context in the EU (G.Brookes & P. BarfootSource

  • 2004-05-12 CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE  園藝作物轉基因產品專輯  Source

·     2004-04-16  Questions and answers on the regulation of GMOs in the EU  (EC)  Source

·     2004-04  Voluntary Labelling And Advertising of Foods That Are and Are Not Products of Genetic Engineering (National Standard of Canada)  Source

·     2004-04  Issues in the regulation of genetically engineered plants and animals  (  PEW Initiative) Source

  • 2004-03  Genetically modified foods & health: a second interim statement (British Medical Association)  Source (download )

  • 2004-01 An Agronomic and Economic Assessment of GMO Canola (Canola Council of Canada)  Source

  • 2004 Gone to Seed: Transgenic Contaminants in the Traditional Seed Supply.  (M. Mellon & J. Erissler, Union of Concerned Scientists)   source  (Full Report)

  • 2003-12  Advice on the implications of the Farm Scale Evaluations for biodiversity in the UK (British Statutory Nature Conservation Agencies, et al. Source

  • 2003-12 Report on the Review of Labelling of Genetically Modified Foods. (FSANZ)  Source

  • 2003-06-15 The Case For A GM-Free Sustainable World. (Independent Science Panel, UK)  Source

  • 2003-05  Developing a Dialogue Tool on Genetically Modified Foods and Feeds in Canada (Exploratory Committee) Source

·     2003-05  An Annotated Bibliography: On The Risks Associated With Genetic Modification (S. Weaver and M. Morris)  Source

·     2003 Genetically Engineered Crop Health Impacts Evaluation - GAPS Analysis.  (Bill Freese) Source

  • 2003-02-25  Detecting Genetically Modified Organisms: Confronting the Limits of Testing to Resolve a Biotech Food Fight  (PEW Initiative) Source

  • 2002-09 Seeds of Doubt.  (H. Warwick and G. Meziani; Soil Association, UK) Source

  • 2002-05 Adoption of Bioengineered Crops.  (J. Fernandez-Cornejo and W.D. McBride; ERS Agricultural Economic Report, USDA) Source

·     2002  Genetically Modified Foods: Experts View Regimen of Safety Tests as Adequate, but FDA's Evaluation Process Could Be Enhanced.  (US General Accounting Office) Source

·     2002  Traceability in the Food Chain    ( Food Chain Strategy Division, Food Standards Agency)   Source

·     2002  PUBLIC ATTITUDES TO GM.  (Food Standards Agency) Source

·     2002  Genetically modified plants for food use and human health - an update. (Royal Society)   Source

·     2001 Elements of Precaution: Recommendations for the Regulation of Food Biotechnology in Canada   Source 

·     2001  A Practical Guide to Containment Greenhouse Research with Transgenic Plants and Microbes. Source

  • New Zealand: Report of the Royal Commission on Genetic Modification.  Source